Senator Thom Tillis Is ‘Guardedly Optimistic’ on Stablecoin Legislation
According to an unconfirmed report circulated in crypto media, Sen. Thom Tillis is “guardedly optimistic” on stablecoin legislation and expects a markup to be scheduled as negotiators try to close one of the most sensitive policy fights in the debate: whether digital-asset platforms should be allowed to offer yield or rewards on stablecoin holdings.
Tillis Signals Cautious Momentum on Stablecoin Legislation
An April 14 report said Tillis expected draft agreement text on stablecoin yield to be released later that week if talks stayed on course, which is the clearest public sign yet that negotiations had moved beyond a stalemate.
“I think the language has come together well. If things proceed the way they are now, we’ll probably release the text publicly later this week.”
Thom Tillis, via April 14 coverage
On March 20, Tillis and Sen. Angela Alsobrooks were reported to have reached an agreement in principle with White House officials on the yield language, and that report said the dispute centered on whether crypto exchanges could keep paying stablecoin holders through rewards programs.
The policy fault line is visible in the Senate’s own draft text: the GENIUS Act markup PDF defines a payment stablecoin as one that “does not offer a payment of yield or interest,” which is why DeFi and exchange operators are watching the next committee move as closely as readers following competitive dynamics in decentralized finance.
Why a Markup Matters for the Stablecoin Bill’s Path
A markup is the committee session where lawmakers review bill text, offer amendments, and decide whether the draft is ready to advance. In this case, the step matters because the Senate Banking Committee said on January 14, 2026 that it was postponing its digital-asset market-structure markup while bipartisan negotiations continued.
Secondary reporting now points to movement after that delay. FinTech Weekly reported that Sen. Cynthia Lummis was targeting a committee markup for the second half of April 2026, after Easter recess ended on April 13, but no directly fetched official notice had confirmed a date at publication.
That gap between a reported draft release window and the absence of a posted committee notice is why Tillis’ tone should be read as momentum rather than a breakthrough. For policy-focused crypto readers, that procedural distinction matters as much as the market-structure debates explored in broader protocol-level proposals.
The White House also put numbers around the fight. A Council of Economic Advisers paper said eliminating stablecoin yield would increase bank lending by $2.1 billion, lift lending by 0.02%, and impose a net welfare cost of $800 million. Those estimates explain why the yield language has become a high-friction issue for lawmakers, banks, and crypto firms alike.
What Crypto Watchers Should Monitor Next
The first milestone to watch is whether the expected markup actually appears on the committee calendar, because the public record currently shows only the January 14 postponement and the later April 14 indication that draft text could be released.
The second milestone is whether any published markup keeps the hard line from the GENIUS Act language or carves out room for exchange rewards, because that choice would shape how stablecoin rules interact with trading venues, DeFi products, and the kind of positioning shifts described in recent derivatives-driven ETH market moves.
If lawmakers do post a markup and release text, the next useful signal will be whether the Tillis-Alsobrooks-White House framework reported on March 20 survives amendments in public. Until then, the stronger claim is that negotiations appear closer to a formal test, not that Congress has settled the stablecoin question.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
