Singapore has revoked the payment license of crypto firm BSQ, formally known as Bsquared Technology Pte Ltd, in a regulatory action that underscores the city-state’s tightening grip on digital asset service providers.
The firm, which operated under the trading name B2, held a Major Payment Institution license issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Its status is now listed as revoked on the MAS Financial Institutions Directory.
TLDR: KEY POINTS
- Singapore’s MAS revoked the payment license of Bsquared Technology Pte Ltd (trading as B2)
- The firm held a Major Payment Institution license for crypto-related payment services
- No official statement from BSQ on next steps has been confirmed at the time of reporting
What the license revocation means for BSQ’s operations
A Major Payment Institution license under Singapore’s Payment Services Act allows firms to provide digital payment token services, cross-border money transfers, and other regulated payment activities. Revocation strips a firm of the legal authority to offer these services in Singapore.
For BSQ’s existing customers, the revocation raises immediate questions about whether the firm can continue processing transactions or holding client funds within the jurisdiction. The MAS registry entry for Bsquared Technology confirms the firm’s changed licensing status.
MAS has not published a detailed public statement outlining the specific grounds for the revocation at the time of this report. The reasons could range from compliance failures to voluntary surrender, though no confirmation exists for either scenario.
Why payment license actions matter for crypto firms
Singapore has positioned itself as a regulated hub for digital asset businesses, making its licensing framework one of the most closely watched in Asia. When MAS takes action against a licensed entity, it sends a signal to other firms operating under similar authorizations.
License revocations can affect counterparty relationships, banking access, and user trust. For firms that depend on Singapore’s regulatory credibility to attract institutional clients, enforcement actions by MAS carry weight beyond the immediate jurisdiction. Similar regulatory scrutiny has played out globally, as seen in cases where authorities have issued warning notices to crypto projects or where proposed regulatory frameworks have reshaped how crypto firms access financial infrastructure.
What to watch next
Several developments could clarify the full impact of this action:
- BSQ’s official response: Whether the firm contests the revocation, announces an appeal, or confirms a wind-down of Singapore operations
- MAS enforcement details: Any forthcoming public statement from MAS explaining the grounds for revocation
- Customer impact: Whether affected users receive guidance on fund withdrawals or account transitions
- Broader licensing trends: Whether this action is isolated or part of a wider review of Major Payment Institution license holders, similar to how regulators elsewhere have revisited crypto-related applications under tightened standards
At the time of reporting, key details including the exact date of revocation, the specific regulatory grounds, and any customer communications from BSQ remain unconfirmed. This article will be updated as official information becomes available.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
