Ledger’s latest multisig interface for its Nano Gen5 device has sparked controversy due to newly implemented fees, drawing criticism from cryptocurrency enthusiasts and developers for altering traditional open-access approaches.
The update raises concerns over user transparency and increased operational costs, impacting Ethereum assets and stirring backlash from the crypto community.
Ledger’s recent multisig update, launched with the Nano Gen5 device, has stirred significant controversy among cryptocurrency users. The update shifts traditional secure self-custody solutions to a fee-based service model.
The update introduces a $10 flat fee per standard transfer and a 0.05% fee on ERC-20 transactions. Critics argue it moves away from Ledger’s open-source philosophy, according to statements from prominent developers.
Ledger Introduces Fees with Nano Gen5 Multisig Update
Ledger’s recent multisig update, launched with the Nano Gen5 device, has stirred significant controversy among cryptocurrency users. The update shifts traditional secure self-custody solutions to a fee-based service model.
The update introduces a $10 flat fee per standard transfer and a 0.05% fee on ERC-20 transactions. Critics argue it moves away from Ledger’s open-source philosophy, according to statements from prominent developers.
Security Concerns Over Ledger’s Closed-Source Interface
Security researchers have expressed concerns over Ledger’s shift towards a proprietary model, citing potential exclusion of Nano S users. Developers criticize the new closed-source interface, raising transparency issues regarding the fee structure.
The financial implication, involving additional transaction costs, could affect Ethereum and ERC-20 users significantly. This shift may reshape Ledger’s revenue model but aligns poorly with community expectations for open-source and transparent operations.
Ledger’s Fee Model Echoes Past Controversies
Historically, Ledger users relied on free, open-source multisig tools. This fee-based model departure echoes prior controversies, such as the backlash against Ledger Recover’s cloud backup fees. Similar changes have rarely occurred in hardware wallet industries.
Ledger’s new multisig is a cash-cow tactic. Treating multisig users as cash cows contradicts the cypherpunk ethos Ledger once embodied. Nano S owners are basically censored. – pcaversaccio, Security Researcher at SEAL-911
Experts indicate potential market backlash, suggesting that this recurring fee model challenges the core decentralization ethos. The new strategy could alienate loyal users, contrasting Ledger’s traditional image as a supporter of transparent crypto solutions.
| Disclaimer: This website provides information only and is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are risky. We do not guarantee accuracy and are not liable for losses. Conduct your own research before investing. |
