The Federal Reserve Board proposed a new “payment account” on December 19, 2025, offering eligible financial institutions limited access to Fed payment infrastructure, a move that addresses years of effort by crypto firms seeking direct settlement capabilities without relying on intermediary banks.
The proposal, published under Docket No. OP-1877, would create an account category distinct from a traditional master account. Unlike full master accounts, which grant broad access to Federal Reserve services including credit facilities, the proposed payment account would not pay interest, would not provide access to Fed credit, and would be subject to balance caps.
What the Federal Reserve is proposing with limited master accounts
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- The Fed proposed a “payment account” limited to clearing and settling payments, with no interest, no credit access, and overnight balance caps.
- Any institution legally eligible under the Federal Reserve Act could request the account, but the proposal does not expand who qualifies.
- The first real-world test came in March 2026, when the Kansas City Fed approved a limited account for Kraken Financial.
A Federal Reserve master account gives a financial institution direct access to the central bank’s payment rails, including Fedwire and ACH. Institutions with master accounts can settle transactions without routing them through a correspondent bank, reducing costs and counterparty risk.
The “limited” qualifier is the core of the news. The proposed payment account strips away the most sensitive features of full master accounts. It is designed solely for clearing and settling payments.
The Federal Register notice specifies that overnight balances would be capped at the lesser of $500 million or 10% of the account holder’s total assets.
Any institution legally eligible under the Federal Reserve Act could request a payment account, but the proposal would not expand legal eligibility for access. This distinction matters: crypto-native firms still need a qualifying charter before applying.
Reserve Banks would generally be expected to complete review of a payment account request within 90 calendar days after receiving all requested documentation.
The Board opened a 45-day public comment window after Federal Register publication. Governor Michael S. Barr publicly dissented on the request for information, arguing that the proposed safeguards were too vague on anti-money laundering and terrorist-financing controls.
Why crypto firms have pursued master accounts for years
The concept originated in an October 21, 2025 speech by Fed Governor Christopher J. Waller, who described a “skinny” master account as a way to provide broader access to Fed payment services for firms like fintechs without granting full privileges.
For crypto firms, direct access to Federal Reserve payment rails eliminates dependence on traditional bank partners. That dependence has been a persistent vulnerability; when banks face regulatory pressure around digital asset clients, crypto companies can lose their banking relationships with little warning.
Ripple’s chief legal officer Stu Alderoty told Reuters in November 2025 that the proposed skinny account was attractive. Ripple had applied for a Fed master account in July 2025.
“I think it’s an attractive idea, and I think it should give traditional banks some comfort.”
— Stu Alderoty, Ripple Chief Legal Officer, via Reuters
Kraken Financial’s experience illustrates how long this pursuit has taken. When the Kansas City Fed approved a one-year limited-purpose account for Kraken on March 4, 2026, the company said the approval followed more than five years of regulatory engagement.
The distinction between industry ambition and actual access granted is important. The proposal does not hand crypto firms the keys to full Fed services. It creates a narrower lane, one that still requires a qualifying charter, compliance infrastructure, and ongoing oversight.
What limited access could mean for crypto firms next
If the payment account framework advances, eligible firms could settle transactions directly on Fedwire, reducing both costs and settlement times compared to routing through correspondent banks. For companies like stablecoin issuers managing large-volume redemptions, faster settlement could be operationally significant.
Significant restrictions remain. No interest on balances, no access to the Fed’s discount window, and hard caps on overnight holdings mean these accounts function as payment utilities, not funding sources. Firms still cannot use them to borrow from the central bank during liquidity stress.
The banking industry has pushed back. The Bank Policy Institute, Financial Services Forum, and The Clearing House issued a joint statement emphasizing that “the United States’ payment system is based on the core principles of trust, security and resiliency,” cautioning against relaxing standards for access to critical financial infrastructure.
Governor Barr’s dissent on AML and CFT safeguards remains an unresolved tension. Whether the final framework includes more specific compliance requirements will shape how many firms can realistically qualify.
The Kraken approval provides the first live test case. Its one-year limited account will generate data on how the structure works in practice, what risks materialize, and whether other Reserve Banks follow Kansas City’s lead in processing applications within the proposed 90-day target.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
