Senator Elizabeth Warren has sent a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency questioning the agency’s process for granting national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency firms, raising fresh concerns about whether the regulator is applying adequate oversight standards to digital asset companies seeking banking credentials.
What Warren is asking the OCC about crypto trust charters
Warren, the senior Democratic member of the Senate Banking Committee, directed her scrutiny at the OCC in a letter published through the committee that pressed the regulator on how it evaluates crypto companies applying for national trust charters. The letter questioned whether applicants met the same supervisory and risk management standards expected of traditional banks.
The OCC, an independent bureau within the U.S. Treasury Department, oversees nationally chartered banks and federal savings associations. Its charter and licensing decisions determine which firms can operate with a federal banking license, making the agency a gatekeeper for crypto companies seeking regulated status in the United States.
Warren’s letter accused the OCC of approving crypto firms that may lack the qualifications and compliance infrastructure required for a national trust charter, according to CoinDesk reporting that detailed the senator’s accusations. She asked the agency to explain its due diligence process and justify recent charter approvals.
Why crypto trust charters are under scrutiny
A national trust charter allows a company to custody assets, manage fiduciary accounts, and operate under a federal banking framework. For crypto firms, obtaining one signals regulatory legitimacy and opens the door to institutional clients who require counterparties with recognized banking credentials.
Charter approvals also carry systemic implications. A firm operating under a national trust charter falls under OCC supervision, meaning its risk management, capital reserves, and compliance programs are subject to federal examination. Warren’s concern centers on whether those examinations are rigorous enough when the chartered entity deals primarily in digital assets.
The scrutiny comes as the broader conversation around stablecoin regulation and digital asset oversight intensifies in Washington. Multiple federal agencies continue to define their jurisdictional boundaries over crypto, and the OCC’s charter decisions sit at the center of that jurisdictional contest.
What this could mean for US crypto regulation next
Congressional pressure on the OCC could slow the pace of future charter approvals for crypto firms. When senior lawmakers publicly question an agency’s standards, the regulator often responds by tightening review processes or issuing additional guidance, even without new legislation.
Firms currently preparing charter applications may face longer timelines and more detailed supervisory expectations. The OCC has already published recent interpretive decisions related to crypto-adjacent banking activities, and Warren’s letter adds political pressure to ensure those decisions reflect strict oversight standards.
The development also fits within a broader pattern of regulatory friction facing digital asset companies seeking traditional financial infrastructure. As firms pursue new listings and institutional integrations, the regulatory framework they operate under increasingly determines their market positioning. Even prediction markets tracking corporate valuations reflect growing investor attention to how regulation shapes crypto’s institutional footprint.
No formal OCC response to Warren’s letter has been published. The agency typically provides written replies to congressional inquiries within weeks, and any public response could signal how the regulator plans to handle crypto charter oversight going forward.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
