John Carvalho, CEO of Synonym, proposed BIP177 in 2025 to change Bitcoin’s unit name, stirring debate among developers and the crypto community over the future of “satoshis”.
This debate highlights the balance between cultural heritage and usability in Bitcoin, with implications for future user experience as Bitcoin’s price rises and ownership becomes less attainable.
BIP177 Proposes Shifting Bitcoin Units to Bits
The BIP177 proposal, introduced by John Carvalho, centers on redefining Bitcoin’s unit naming. It suggests standardizing “bitcoin” as the base display unit, aiming to simplify user interfaces. Debate focuses on balancing cultural tradition and usability. “In 2025, BIP 177 was introduced by Synonym CEO John Carvalho as a proposal to redefine Bitcoin’s commonly understood unit by making the base unit Bitcoin and standardizing how it is displayed.”
Key figures include Carvalho and prominent Bitcoin developers. Actions involve proposing a shift from satoshis to bits, advocating for usability. This reflects ongoing community discussions about evolving Bitcoin’s user experience in response to increasing BTC prices.
Community Divided Over Cultural Legacy and Usability
The proposal has sparked a mix of support and criticism within the Bitcoin community. Some view it as a necessary step towards mainstream adoption, while others fear it may erase a part of Bitcoin’s cultural legacy.
There are no immediate financial or regulatory impacts from BIP177, as it does not alter protocol rules. Instead, it influences user interfaces. The change may require years of discussion, testing, and community consensus to ensure successful adoption.
Satoshi Naming Debate Repeats Historical Patterns
This debate is reminiscent of the prior adoption of the Satoshi subunit. Past protocol updates, like SegWit and Taproot, underscore the prolonged, scrutinized nature of Bitcoin decision-making, emphasizing culture versus usability balancing acts.
Experts from Kanalcoin suggest that these naming changes could shape Bitcoin’s mass-market appeal. The conversation emphasizes user experience’s role in influencing public adoption, beyond technical updates, illustrating cryptocurrency’s broader cultural evolution.
| Disclaimer: This website provides information only and is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are risky. We do not guarantee accuracy and are not liable for losses. Conduct your own research before investing. |
